From the American Dietetic Association
CMS’s Final Decision on Intensive Behavioral Counseling for Obesity December 1, 2011
The American Dietetic Association understands and shares members’ concerns about the announcement by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) on Tuesday, November 29 about their decision to cover Intensive Behavioral Counseling for Obesity for eligible Medicare beneficiaries. We’d like to share the following information in an effort to answer member questions about this decision and what it means for Registered Dietitians (RDs).
How did CMS make this decision?
Through the Medicare Improvements for Patients and Providers Act (MIPPA), CMS has the authority to add coverage of additional preventive services under a process called a National Coverage Determination. This process is not a legislative one, meaning the decision is not made through Congress. Rather, CMS is the decision-making body. CMS is required to evaluate relevant clinical evidence to determine whether or not the proposed service meets three criteria:
1. Reasonable and necessary for the prevention or early detection of illness or disability;
2. Is recommended with a Grade A or B by the US Preventive Services Task Force; and
3. Is appropriate for individuals entitled to benefits under Part A or enrolled under Part B of the Medicare program.
The process includes two opportunities for public comment. On March 11, 2011 CMS announced it was opening a national coverage analysis for Intensive Behavioral Therapy for Obesity with a 30-day public comment period. On August 31, 2011 CMS issued its proposed decision memorandum with a 30-day comment period.
Was ADA involved?
Definitely! ADA offered comments during both public comment periods. These comments incorporated input from members with expertise in weight management services and were reviewed and approved by member leaders. Visit http://www.eatright.org/mnt/ and scroll down to “Medicare MNT Coverage Expansion” to read more. In November ADA also met with CMS staff, along with other members of the Obesity Care Coalition, to advocate for inclusion of RDs in the proposed benefit.
What exactly did CMS decide to cover?
CMS determined it will cover screening and intensive behavioral counseling for obesity by primary care providers in settings such as physicians’ offices for Medicare beneficiaries with a body mass index (BMI) > 30 kg/m2. Specifically, Medicare will cover:
• One face-to-face visit every week for the first month;
• One face-to-face visit every other week for months 2-6;
• One face-to-face visit every month for months 7-12, if the beneficiary has achieved a reduction in weight of at least 3kg over the course of the first six months of intensive therapy.
The service must be furnished by a “qualified primary care physician or other primary care practitioner and in a primary care setting.” CMS refers to the Social Security Act for its definition of a “qualified primary care physician” to mean a physician who is a general practitioner, family practice practitioner, general internist or obstetrician or gynecologist. In similar manner, CMS defines “primary care practitioner” as a physician with a primary specialty designation of family medicine, internal medicine, geriatric medicine or pediatric medicine or a nurse practitioner, clinical nurse specialist, or physician assistant in accordance with the Social Security Act.
Lastly, the service must be furnished in the primary care setting. CMS defines a primary care setting “as one in which there is provision of integrated, accessible health care services by clinicians who are accountable for addressing a large majority of personal health care needs, developing a sustained partnership with patients, and practicing in the context of family and community. Emergency departments, inpatient hospital settings, ambulatory surgical centers, independent diagnostic testing facilities, skilled nursing facilities, inpatient rehabilitation facilities and hospices are not considered primary care settings under this definition.”
What was the rationale behind CMS’s decision to not include RDs as providers of these services?
Based on CMS’s responses to public comments in this final decision memo as well as the one issued earlier this month for Intensive Behavioral Counseling for Cardiovascular Disease, it appears that CMS excluded RDs for two reasons:
1. CMS believes it lacks the statutory authority to include RDs as providers outside of diabetes and end stage renal disease; and
2. CMS believes it is important that preventive services be furnished in a coordinated approach as part of a comprehensive prevention plan within the context of the patient’s total health care. As such, they believe primary care practitioners are best qualified to offer care in this context.
How will these services be paid and when does the benefit become effective?
The answers to these questions have yet to be determined. CMS is in the process of establishing codes and developing the claims processing instructions for this NCD.
What do we do now?
As individual practitioners: RDs as providers of nutrition services have 2 options when it comes to obesity services for Part B Medicare beneficiaries:
1. The CMS decision memorandum does state that the new benefit does not preclude primary care practitioners from referring eligible beneficiaries to other practitioners and/or settings for counseling; however coverage remains only in the primary care setting. So RDs can receive referrals for these services, but the Medicare beneficiary would need to be informed prior to providing the service that it is not covered by Medicare and they would be required to pay out of pocket for the service.
2. The CMS decision memorandum also states that in the primary care office setting and primary care hospital outpatient setting, Medicare may cover these services when furnished by auxiliary personnel (e.g., RDs) and billed as “incident to” services in accordance with 42 CFR section 410.26(b) or 410.27, meaning:
a. There is direct physician supervision of auxiliary personnel (the physician must be present in the office suite and immediately available to provide assistance and direction throughout the time the service is being provided).
b. “Auxiliary personnel” means any individual who is acting under the supervision of a physician, regardless of whether the individual is an employee, leased employee, or independent contractor of the physician, or of the legal entity that employs or contracts with the physician. Note: Medicare Part B MNT services for diabetes and non-dialysis renal disease cannot be billed as “incident to” services since they are recognized as a separate benefit category.
We recognize that both of these options fall short of the ideal scenario. However, as healthcare delivery and payment models move away from fee-for-service to bundled payment models (such as Patient-Centered Medical Homes and Accountable Care Organizations), now is a good time for RDs to align themselves with primary care practitioners in new ways. Continue to market yourself and your services to both primary care practitioners and Medicare beneficiaries to create demand for your services and demonstrate the value you bring to a comprehensive and coordinated model of care. As an RD, you can positively impact a practice’s bottom line by helping patients and the practice achieve positive clinical outcomes. Most importantly, you can collect, report, and publish outcomes data to strengthen the foundation of clinical evidence used by CMS and others in making coverage decisions.
As ADA: The Nutrition Services Coverage team and the Policy Initiatives and Advocacy team are strategically working to position RDs as providers of MNT in other disease conditions through a variety of initiatives. With this new insight into CMS’s approach to expanding coverage, we are exploring potential strategies on both the legislative and regulatory fronts. We will continue to share information with members through all available communication channels.
Click here to read the full CMS Final Decision Memorandum.
Nutrition Services Coverage Team
Note: This message was posted on behalf of Roberta Anding, SCAN's representative to the House of Delegates.
This is a call to action for all RDs! We need to interact on multiple levels with other providers and government officials to add us as providers for obesity care. We are 70,000+ strong and we are being denied the ability to bill for a service that we routinely provide. Enough with documentating outcomes. It's time to descend on CMS with our outrage and concern that our inability to bill for this service will hinder the appropriate care of obese individuals. I wonder, would CMS expect MDs and NPs to perform and bill for physical therapy and not allow PTs to do so?
ReplyDeleteThis decision is mind numbing. Clearly no logical argument will sway decision makers because logic isn't being used to make these rulings.
ReplyDeleteI am pleased to see at any level that obesity is being viewed as an epidemic that needs qualified professionals to assist patients with this disease. I do believe that it will fail as without a complete team effort which includes the RD most patients will not get the education and direction they need on a one to one basis to make this trial program work. As amazing as doctors are they do not have the time to personally coach and support this disease. The behavioral therapist does not have a nutrition background to discuss specific meal plans for the patients with medical issues such as diabetes or heart disease. As a dietitian for over 20 years I have learned one thing. It takes a team to promote wellness. Each team member playing their part and not 2 team members trying to perform everyones role. This current trial period will not be successful in my opinion. And by the way, CMS better pay well. The therapists in my area charge between 150 to 350 dollars an hour and most do not want to accept any insurance at all for disordered eating behaviors.
ReplyDeleteI am discouraged that the outcomes were based on weight loss vs. wellness/health outcomes (i.e. blood pressure, lipids, A1c, etc.). The obesity epidemic is an extremely complex issue involving hormones, genetics, environment, behavioral factors, coping skills, etc. I agree we need a team consisting of a physician, exercise physiologist, RD, and psychologist to have the best outcomes. However, I feel we should use the "Health At Every Size" approach (similar to Canada's Vitality Program) and the focus should be placed on a healthy lifestyle/wellness/health and lab values vs. the number on the scale. Since the weight loss outcomes are extremely poor (i.e. 95% of people regain after 5 years) and the dangers of weight cycling are many (i.e. increased risk of mortality, gallbladder disease, high cholestorol, compulsive or deprivation-driven eating style, etc.), this program goes against the rule of "first do no harm".
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete1. Where is the grade A or B evidence that primary care practitioners in a primary care setting can have successful outcomes?
ReplyDelete2. When we have a critical shortage of primary care physicians and midlevels, why would we try to give them new time-consuming therapies? This is counterproductive for increasing the availability of primary care to the millions of Americans who need it.
3. Would anyone promote primary care physicians and midlevels to do respiratory therapy, physical therapy, occupational therapy, mental health counseling? Then why would we expect them to do medical nutrition therapy?
Marla Heller, MS, RD
I am pretty appalled at this decision by medicare. Especially as the nutrition care process specifically highlights the behavioral modification strategies dietitians are expected to employ. I am curious about the training differences between those deemed to be qualified and the dietetic education that the CMS feels creates a distinction.
ReplyDeleteJaimie Winkler, RD, LD
NOTE TO SELF:
ReplyDelete1. Align with PCPs in new ways
2. Market to PCPSs and Medicare beneficiaries in new ways. (IDEAS??)
3. Advocate for comprehensive and coordinated model of care, articulate what the RD can/will do.
4. Create spreadsheet for with initial assessment (this is big!), triage options, and columns for re-assessing rx, clinical AND behavioral outcomes.
5. Contact ADA to see if they have a spreadsheet to build upon. Might be nice for standardization if all RDs had it because
6. Most importantly, collect, report, and publish outcomes data to strengthen the foundation of clinical evidence used by CMS and others in making coverage decisions."
It takes a village. Ranting and raging won't win this. RDs ARE ahead of the curve in thinking this thru. MDs will need time to catch up. Ahh, aligning in new ways includes educating MDs on MNT. Thank you RD Kelly Adams for all your work: http://www.nutritioninmedicine.net/neppphp/NeppPortal.php
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteI work in 2 Primary Care settings were MD's, PA's and NP's routinely will refer Medicare patients for MNT for weight issues. I have offered patients without Diabetes or Renal Dx the option to see me under a fee for service structure, which in many cases they agree to pay. My ? is whether now that we could use the "incident to" criteria under Medicare, to bill for MNT for Obesity; can we switch to the "Incident to" designation depending on the diagnosis? I have not used the "Incident to" due to the fact that it appears as if the MD is providing the service and not the RD's, and I feel strongly that we need to continue to make our services visible to the insurance companies. Any thoughts on my ? would be appreciated.
ReplyDeleteThe answer I got directly from the nutrition services coding team is the yes incident to MD services will be considered but more comments after a meeting last week in DC will be forthcoming. That does not help any of us who work outside of that business model, nor will provide evidence that our independent services and produce successful long term cost savings to the healthcare system.
ReplyDeleteAs former coding and coverage chair this comes as a blow for all of us who have worked against this. I agree with all the above comments that we should be the front line providers. As I had shared to those involved in this outcome, would medicare suggest PT to be conducted strictly in an MD office by an MD?
I am involved in a program that truly assesses health risk based on clinical labs( BP,lipids, HgA1C, etc) and proven outcomes that go beyond the number on the scale independent of MD services. The MD driven business model continues to reduce our profession it "incidental." Research demonstrates that RD's could be the leaders for achieving lowered health care cost of all if given the tools to allow it! Linda Arpino, MA,RD,CDN
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteGreat posts on this subject.
ReplyDeleteHere's a thought:
After 6 months of IBT, to be eligible for additional face-to-face visits occurring once a month for an additional six months, beneficiaries must have achieved a reduction in weight of at least 3kg over the course of the first six months of intensive therapy.
It would be interesting to compare data for those eligible to continue and those not eligible by type of practitioner delivering the services. Many primary care practices may utilize a contract RD and some may either provide the services or ask a nurse to provide the services.
Carol Fenwick MHS RD LD ACSM HFS
I am posting this comment on behalf of SCAN's Chair who received the following message from the ADA Director of DPG Relations:
ReplyDeletePlease consider signing ADA's petition to President Obama to urge CMS to include RDs in obesity treatment. We need 25,000 signatures for the White House to review:http://wh.gov/DWX. Announcement of this petition is being pushed out through ADA’s social media, Eat Right Weekly and various electronic mailing lists, electronic communities and leadership groups.
We encourage you to post it to your Facebook and Twitter accounts, as well as, sharing with clients and colleagues. With everyone’s help, we’re confident we can easily surpass the minimum goal to address this issue.
Diane Juskelis, MS, RD, LDN
Director, DPG/MIG/Affiliate Relations
New Name, Same Committment to Public's Nutritional Health:
In January 2012, the American Dietetic Association Becomes the
Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics
120 South Riverside Plaza, Suite 2000
Chicago, IL, 60606
www.eatright.org
312-899-4811
fax - 312-899-5352
Please send out email to all members with link.
ReplyDeleteInstructions for signing the petition:
ReplyDeleteGo to: http://wh.gov/DWX
If you have signed a petition on the WhiteHouse.gov site before, then sign in.
If you have never signed a petition on the WhiteHouse.gov site before, then you must create a new account.
Click on Create an Account
Fill out the form. First name, last name, and email address are required.
In the large white box there will be two words. Type these two words (with a space between the words) in the box just below where they appear. This is to prevent spam and is a required part of the registration process.
Click on register.
You will receive an email in a few minutes. You must click on the link in that email to continue.
Once you click on the link (or paste it in your browser) then you can click on Sign This Petition
You will see a confirmation message on the screen and will see that the total number of signatures on the petition will increase by 1.